ED information criticism in opposition to Anil Deshmukh and aides

ED information criticism in opposition to Anil Deshmukh and aides

The Enforcement Directorate on Monday submitted a criticism in opposition to Maharashtra’s former Home Minister Anil Deshmukh and his non-public secretary Sanjeev Palande and private assistant Kundan Shinde in a cash laundering case in opposition to them earlier than a particular prevention of cash laundering act (PMLA) courtroom.

Mr. Shine and Mr. Palande have been arrested by ED on June 26 beneath Section 3 (offence of cash laundering) and 19 (energy to arrest) of PMLA and are presently in judicial custody. Despite 5 summons, Mr. Deshmukh failed to seem earlier than the investigating company.

On April 5, the Bombay High Court had directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to conduct an inquiry in opposition to Mr. Deshmukh on fees of corruption. Soon a FIR was registered by the CBI in opposition to Mr. Deshmukh, which led to the ED initiating a probe in opposition to him.

In July Mr. Palande had admitted to the ED that Mr. Deshmukh had a job in switch posting of law enforcement officials, particularly the posting of IPS officers.


As per ED’s probe, 11 corporations have been immediately managed by members of the family of Mr. Deshmukh and one other 13 corporations got here to mild that are within the names of shut associates of Deshmukh household. Bank account statements present that cash has been flowing from corporations not directly managed by Mr. Deshmukh’s members of the family to corporations immediately managed by them.

There are statements of bar homeowners and managers that reveal that dismissed police officer Sachin Vaze, presently lodged at Taloja Central Jail, collected cash from them and Vaze in his assertion mentioned he was getting direct directions from Mr. Deshmukh to take action. Vaze has mentioned he was informed to gather ₹3 lakh per 30 days from numerous bars and eating places and that he handed over ₹4.70 crores from December 2020 to February 2021 to Mr. Shinde on behalf of Mr. Deshmukh.

Source link