Amravati killing a terror act with nationwide safety angle, states NIA FIR

While the Amravati Police registered ISIS type homicide of pharmacist Umesh Kolhe with theft as a motive, the NIA FIR makes it clear that nothing was stolen from the sufferer who was performed to demise by Islamists.

The National Investigating Agency (NIA) has referred to as the grotesque ISIS-style killing of Umesh Kolhe by Islamists in Amravati a terror act with the motive to terrorize a “section of people of India” within the registered FIR on late Saturday evening. The NIA will even examine whether or not the case is a part of a nationwide or the savage crime has been instigated from overseas.

A case underneath Section 16, 18 and 20 of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) and Section 34, 153 (A), 153 (B), 120 (B) and 302 IPC has been filed primarily based on a grievance by the sufferer’s son. Umesh Prahladrao Kolhe, a pharmacist from Satuma Amravati, was performed to demise by three bike-riding Islamists as a punishment meted out to the sufferer for supporting former BJP chief Nupur Sharma’s anti-Prophet remarks on a TV channel debate. The FIR has listed Mudassir Ahmed, Shahrukh Pathan, Abdul Thoufik, Shoaib Khan, Atib Rashid, Yusuf Khan, Shahim Ahmed and Irfan Khan as accused together with unknown others.

“The said incident of a cold-blooded murder of deceased Umesh Kolhe was an act of larger conspiracy of a group of accused persons and others who have conspired among themselves to strike terror amongst a section of people of India and with their assertions attempted to promote enmity on the grounds of religion and thereby commit a terrorist act on June 21 between 10.00-1030 pm,” said the NIA FIR. The NIA filed an FIR primarily based on a Union Home Ministry order on Saturday asking the nodal federal investigating company to take up the case.


While the savage crime was dedicated by Islamists on June 21, 5 days earlier than the Udaipur killing of an identical nature, the Amravati police registered it as a case of homicide with theft as a motive. The NIA FIR makes it very clear that nothing was stolen from the sufferer, posing severe questions on the police of the state then underneath the MVA authorities headed by Uddhav Thackeray. Fact is that the state police DGP didn’t ship any report back to the Centre in regards to the incident regardless of being requested and as an alternative waited for the NIA to take up the case.

“The Central Government is of the opinion that a Scheduled Offence under the NIA Act 2008 has been committed and having regards to the gravity of the offence, and the repercussions to the national security, it is required to be investigated by the NIA in accordance with the Act,” said the FIR.

Close Story

Source link